Detroit OWI and DUI cases move quickly. The first days after an arrest often determine whether video is preserved, whether testing records are obtained, and whether license deadlines are met. This page is a starting point for understanding the common OWI and DUI charges prosecuted in Wayne County and the practical defense issues that follow.

Michigan’s primary drunk driving statute is MCL 257.625. Section 625 includes standard OWI, OWVI, High BAC allegations, repeat-offense enhancements, injury-related felonies, and controlled-substance offenses. Each charge has different elements and different licensing consequences, so accurate charge identification is the first step toward a coherent defense plan.

Many OWI cases are decided on evidence and procedure rather than on assumptions. The legality of the stop, the basis for arrest, and the reliability of chemical testing can be litigated. The goal is to force the prosecution to prove each element beyond a reasonable doubt, and to exclude evidence when the state fails to follow constitutional or statutory requirements.

Use the links below to review the specific OWI topics most relevant to your situation, including first and second offense cases, felony exposure, High BAC, implied consent licensing issues, drugged driving, and defenses that frequently control outcomes in Detroit courts.

OWI & DUI Defense

Michigan’s Section 625 framework is broader than many people expect. In addition to standard OWI under MCL 257.625(1), Michigan recognizes OWVI under MCL 257.625(3), High BAC under MCL 257.625(1)(c), and a separate controlled-substance presence offense under MCL 257.625(8). The Traffic Benchbook organizes these offenses and links them to the corresponding jury instructions, reflecting that each charge has distinct elements and proof pathways.

Penalties and sanctions are also tiered. The Benchbook summarizes that MCL 257.625(9) sets baseline OWI penalties and increases them for High BAC and for repeat offenses, including felony treatment after two or more prior convictions. The statute also limits the suspension of certain incarceration terms unless the defendant participates in and successfully completes a specialty court program, which can materially affect sentencing strategy.

Evidence disputes remain central across the entire OWI spectrum. A lawful stop and a lawful arrest are prerequisites for many forms of evidence, and chemical testing depends on lawful acquisition and reliable administration. Modern chemical-testing litigation is informed by cases such as Missouri v. McNeely and Birchfield v. North Dakota, and Michigan courts have applied those principles in the Section 625 setting. The result is that legality and procedure can matter as much as the alleged number.

Finally, OWI defense is not only about the criminal case. Administrative consequences, including implied consent sanctions for refusal and longer-term restoration requirements after revocation, can be outcome-determinative in a client’s life. A complete approach integrates litigation, negotiation, and licensing strategy so that the resolution is workable both in court and on the road.

Why Choose William Maze As Your Criminal Defense Attorney?

As a Detroit criminal defense attorney, I provide specialized expertise in Detroit's court systems. I understand the specific procedures, judges, and prosecutors in Detroit courts, giving my clients a distinct advantage in their criminal defense cases.

Local Expertise:

• Knowledge of Detroit judges' preferences
• Experience with Detroit prosecutors
• Understanding of local court procedures
• Relationships with court personnel

Attorney Credentials:

• 28+ years Detroit experience
• Expert witness qualified
• Former CDAM President
• SFST certified instructor

William J. Maze, Esq.

Detroit Criminal Defense Attorney

Expert Witness 28+ Years